SYLLABUS

E50.1500:  Environmental Ethics

 

Spring 2004, New York University

 

Instructor:  Andrew Light, Assistant Professor of Environmental Philosophy

Office:  246 Greene Street, Room 314E

Office Hours:  Tuesdays, 10:00-12:00,and by appointment.

Location of Class:  48 CS, Room 102

Phone and messages:  212-998-5636

E-mail:  andrew.light@nyu.edu

 

Texts:              Environmental Ethics:  An Anthology

                        eds. A. Light and H. Rolston III (Blackwell Publishing, 2003)

 

Summary of Class and Requirements: 

 

            What role can philosophy play in meeting the overwhelming challenge of environmental degradation and the human response (or responsibility?) to that degradation?  Has the emerging field of environmental ethics been of use in meeting this challenge, or is philosophy too theoretically oriented to contribute to the resolution of such practical problems?  This class will serve as a foundation to discussion of these issues with a focus on contemporary environmental moral and political theories, as well as the general use of philosophical methods in broader environmental questions.  In the first part of the class we will read and discuss a variety of philosophical debates which have evolved over the past thirty years (primarily in Europe and North America) among philosophers answering the call to develop a new, environmental, ethic.  Topics to be covered include individual versus collective approaches to moral consideration of the environment; varieties of approaches to the challenging of articulating a non instrumental value to nature, and the question of whether environmental ethics should embrace some form of moral pluralism.  In the second part of the class we will examine critiques of the dominant schools of thought in environmental ethics focusing on challenges raised by pragmatists and feminists.  We will see how these challenges effect on the ground debates regarding environmental policy, including the question of whether we should try to restore the nature we have damaged and whether it makes sense any more to attempt to preserve areas as Òwilderness.Ó  

            Requirements for the course for all students will include a take home exam due in the seventh week of the class.  Undergraduates will take another take home exam due during finals week.  Graduate students will instead write a final paper on a topic of their choice at the end of the semester (15 pages maximum), also due during finals week.  The topic of this paper must be given prior approval.  Each participant should provide a written summary of the topic of this paper by the ninth week of the course.  Graduate students may also submit rough drafts of the final paper for comments and suggestions for improvements up to one week prior to the final due date of the paper.

            Appeals of any grades must be made in writing (typed), providing a detailed argument for why a grade should be increased.  Any work found to be plagiarized will be given a mark of 0 and disciplinary action will be taken.  Late work will not be accepted.   All students are expected to read all assingments in advance of the course and be prepared to discuss them in class.

 

READING SCHEDULE*

 

What is Environmental Ethics?

 

J20:      Introduction to Class and Philosophical Methodology 

J22:      Overviews:  Light & Rolston, p. 1 and Palmer, p. 15

 

J27:      Early Discussions:  Leopold, p. 38 and Sylvan, p. 47

J29:      No class.

 

Who Counts in an Environmental Ethics?

 

F3:       Individualism:  Singer, p. 55

F5:       Individualism:  Regan, p. 65

 

F10:     Holism:  Katz, p. 85

F12:     Problems with Holism: Varner, p. 95

 

Is Nature Intrinsically Valuable?

 

F17:     Nonanthropocentrism: Rolston, p. 131 and Lee, p. 154

F19:     Weak Anthropocentrism:  Norton, p. 163 and Hargrove, p. 175

 

Is There Only One Envioronmental  Ethic?

 

F24:     Pluralism and Its Critics:  Stone, p. 193

F26:     Pluralism and Its Critics:  Callicott, p. 203

            Midterm Assigned

 

M2:     Recovering Pluralism:  Light, p. 229

M4      Final Discussion of Major Debates in the Field

            Midterm Due

 

What Alternatives Exist?

 

M9:     Deep Ecology:  Fox, p. 252 and Naess, p. 262

M11:   Ecofeminism:  Gaard & Gruen, p. 276 & Warren and Cheney, p. 294

 

M16-M18:      No Class – Spring Break

 

M23:   Pragmatism:  Weston, p. 307 and Minteer & Manning, p. 319

M25:   Summary Discussion of Alternatives

Paper Topic Due for Graduate Students

 

Focusing on Particular Environmental Issues

 

M30-A01:       Sustainability:  Cobb, p. 359 and Jamieson, p. 371

 

A06-A08:        Restoration:  Elliot, p. 381, Katz, p. 390 and Light, p. 398

 

A13-A15:        Wilderness:  Nelson, p. 413, Callicott, p. 437 and Noss, p. 444

 

Human Social Issues and the Environment

 

A20:    Feeding People vs. Saving Nature:  Rolston, p. 451 and Attfield, p. 463

A22:    Human Rights and Env. Justice:  Nickel & Viola, p. 472

 

A27:    Sense of Place:  Norton & Hannon, p. 500

A29     Environmental Education:  Bennan, p. 516

 

Final Examinations, Specific Due Date TBA

 

 

 

* Readings are listed by authorÕs last name and the first page of the assigned chapter.